Jump to content

Managing a necessary evil: Can payment methods reduce product returns?

Journal article

Fast facts

  • Internal authorship

  • Further publishers

    Ina Garnefeld, Eva Böhm, Katharina Kessing

  • Publishment

    • Elsevier BV (unbekannt) 2026
  • Purpose of publication

  • Subjects

    • Business administration
  • Research fields

    • Other field of research

Quote

I. Garnefeld, E. Böhm, K. Kessing, and L. Klimke, "Managing a necessary evil: Can payment methods reduce product returns?", Journal of Retailing, 2026.

Content

Product returns represent a serious challenge for online retailers and environmental protection alike. Taking a fresh perspective on effective product return management options, the current study proposes payment methods as a potential driver of product returns. By combining field data from an online fashion and accessory retailer with a laboratory experiment, the authors show that payment before product delivery (e.g., direct debit, PayPal) reduces customers' product returns compared with payment after delivery (e.g., invoicing, Prime Wardrobe). Psychological ownership and perceived return effort represent the underlying mechanisms that determine the effects of these payment methods on return behavior: If customers pay before they receive the product, they experience stronger feelings of psychological ownership and perceive higher effort to return it. However, this effect only occurs when retailers offer free shipping. Considering that small reductions in return rates can have considerable effects on retailers' bottom lines and the environment, a tactical approach to managing online payment methods suggests immense potential for sustainable online retailing.

References

Notes and references

This site uses cookies to ensure the functionality of the website and to collect statistical data. You can object to the statistical collection via the data protection settings (opt-out).

Settings(Opens in a new tab)